The non-public Version of this new Counselor Survey (PST-Q) is made by the Fernandez-Alvarez mais aussi al

(2003), and was designed to assess “brand new group of features that each specialist is applicable in virtually any psychotherapeutic situation, therefore creating an element of the features of the latest therapeutic act” (p. 117). The newest questionnaire assesses five different dimensions: flexibility-firmness (Informative subscale), distance-closeness (Expressive subscale), smaller engagesment-deeper wedding (Engagement subscale), greater focused-slim centered (Attentional subscale) and you will impulsive-prepared (Operative subscale). This will be good 36-item mind-statement size filled out of the therapists that have responses ranked toward a measure ranging from step one (complete argument)to eight (complete contract). The new measure shows an examination-retest reliability off .79, that have Chronbach’s reliability coefficients for every subscale, below; informative, .69; expressive, .75; engagement, .78; attentional, .80; operative, .78. Foundation Study found good KMO = .756 (Get a hold of Desk step one to own alphas in today’s analysis).

Performing Alliance Collection-Quick Setting (WAI-S)

The functional Alliance Inventory (WAI), created by Horvath Greenberg (1986), is actually an effective 36 items questionnaire that can easily be given so you’re able to one another members and you can therapists which can be ranked on the an excellent eight-part Likert type of measure from1 (never)so you’re able to 7 (always). Tracey and you will Kokotovic (1989) suggested a person and counselor Functioning Alliance List-Short Function (WAI-S), that contains four issues for each and every subscale (Task, Objective, and you may Bond) and you may total WAI-S results, appearing higher precision that have leader membership exactly like, as well as a lot better than new WAI toward specialist subscales and you can full mediocre ratings (Task, leader = .83; Bond, leader = .91; Goal, alpha = .88; and Standard Alliance, leader = .95). Discover Desk step one getting alphas in the modern data.

Procedure Listing (TL)

The methods Listing level are adapted out of Hollis (1995), who catalogued a thorough a number of counseling and you may psychotherapy process representing a broad spectrum of philosophical basics. To refine which comprehensive listing centered on procedure utilized particularly from the cognitive behavioral and you will constructivist treatment orientations, we recruited counseling psychology graduate pupils to read through the entire directory of 108 cures processes and you may rates the fresh new the total amount to which for every technique is used by for each therapeutic strategy (intellectual behavioral and you may constructivist), having fun with a 5-section Likert types of size from 1 (Never otherwise Hardly ever) in order to 5 (Always otherwise Typically).

Procedures

Sixteen counseling psychology graduate students participated in these ratings (six men, 10 women), with the M_age = (SD = 2.67). Results of a paired differences analysis for all 108 items indicated that there were 77 techniques rated as being used with significantly differential frequency by cognitive behavioral and constructivist therapies. We then divided this distribution of 77 techniques into quartiles and retained the top and bottom quartiles. This resulted in 20 cognitive behavioral techniques (e.g.advice giving, rational restructuring) and 20 constructivist techniques (e.g. emotional processing, reflection) that were rated most significantly different (cognitive behavioral vs. constructivist). This final list of 40 items of therapy techniques (20 cognitive behavioral techniques; 20 constructivist techniques) was used in the current study.

This type of forty circumstances was in fact noted alphabetically and you will members was asked so you’re able to rates the fresh the total amount that they use for each and every method within their habit of therapy with each other a beneficial 5-part level from 1 (Never ever otherwise Almost never)to help you 5 (Constantly or Always). The fresh analysis of the 20 rationalist points was in fact summed and good imply was calculated to help you echo the typical frequency of using rationalist interventions (you are able to range = 1-5), plus the same procedure was utilized in relation to brand new 20 constructivist interventions.

The brand new intense data was applied in order to make a great confirmatory foundation studies to the Process Number level. The present day study is looked at to possess multiple-variate normalcy and assumptions have been came across. Most of the kurtosis rates on details decrease anywhere between step 1 and –1 variables except constructivist situations several, thirteen, sixteen, and you will 20 and you may cognitive behavioural goods step 3, which had an effective kurtosis values ranging from 2 and you will –2. Therefore, such five affairs was basically removed from the newest scale in advance of running new confirmatory foundation studies.

13 ธันวาคม 2022

0 responses on "The non-public Version of this new Counselor Survey (PST-Q) is made by the Fernandez-Alvarez mais aussi al"

Leave a Message ยกเลิกการตอบ

คุณต้องเข้าสู่ระบบ เพื่อจะพิมพ์ความเห็น

หลักสูตรของเรา